LunarCrush discloses top AI crypto projects by social activity, with Bittensor ($TAO) leading, followed by $FET, $RENDER, $HOLO, and a few others.LunarCrush discloses top AI crypto projects by social activity, with Bittensor ($TAO) leading, followed by $FET, $RENDER, $HOLO, and a few others.

LunarCrush Reveals the List Top AI Projects by Social Activity

2025/09/24 02:15
aii55

LunarCrush, a platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze digital assets like cryptocurrencies, has revealed the list of Top 10 AI Projects by social activity. Social Activity consists of Posts, Interactions, and Social Dominance. These three measures are used to check the Social activity of cryptocurrencies. Bittersor ($TAO) leads the Tops 10 AI Projects by social activity.

CryptoDep has released this news through its official X account. In this ranking list, Bittensor ($TAO) dominates the market with 10.9K posts, 923K Interactions, and stands with 0.80% Social Dominance.

Simultaneously, Fetch ($FET) is runner-up in this race with 2.67K Posts and 151K Interactions, and got 0.25% Social Dominance. The huge difference between these AI Projects shows that the demand for ($TAO) is much more than ($FET) in the crypto market.

$RENDER and $HOLO show Small Posts Gap with Huge Interactions Difference

RENDER ($RENDER) and Holoworld AI ($HOLO) got third and fourth position with 2.35K and 1.85K Posts, respectively. These AI Projects show negligible difference in term of Posts about 0.5K. While moving to Interactions in which there difference got hype to 171K. So, ($RENDER) stands with 138K, and ($HOLO) at 309K in Interactions and have Social Dominance of 0.25% and 0.20% respectively.

Moreover, there two more AI projects which got Posts in ‘thousands’ by social activity. In this the first one is PAAL AI ($PAAL) gained 1.57K posts and 123K Interactions with Social Dominance of 0.20%. Further, the next one is ChainGPT ($CGPT) positioned its-self with 1.14K Posts and 100K Interactions with the 0.15% Social Dominance in the market.

$LimeWire and $QUBIC Show Diverging Momentum

LimeWire ($LMWR) and QUBIC ($QUBIC) observed very close to each other in terms of Posts with 845 and 802 respectively. But, they show huge difference in terms of Interactions which is about 89K, and in this way ($LMWR) placed with 197K and ($QUBIC) with 108K in Interactions. Both AI Projects have same 0.10% Social Dominance.

In addition, Virtuals ($VIRTUAL) and AITECH ($AITECH) got second last and last position, respectively. In this race both AI Projects got 723 and 675 Posts, 82.7K and 197K Interactions, and 0.10% and 0.05% Social Dominance respectively.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The Beijing Procuratorate announced a case of illegal USDT cross-border foreign exchange transactions involving over 1.1 billion yuan.

The Beijing Procuratorate announced a case of illegal USDT cross-border foreign exchange transactions involving over 1.1 billion yuan.

PANews reported on October 29th that, according to a report by 21st Century Business Herald, on October 28th, the Beijing Municipal People's Procuratorate released "Typical Cases of High-Quality and Efficient Performance of Financial Procuratorial Duties" (2024-2025). One case involved "using virtual currency to indirectly buy and sell foreign exchange, involving over 1.1 billion yuan." Between January and August 2023, Lin Jia, under the instruction of others, colluded with Lin Yi, Xia, Bao, and Chen to use multiple bank cards under their names to receive large amounts of RMB funds transferred from clients (such as Liu) connected to the "upstream" of an illegal currency exchange organization. This gang used virtual currency as a "bridge" to achieve the illegal purpose of cross-border fund transfers: Lin Jia and others converted the received RMB into USDT through multiple USDT trading platform accounts they actually controlled, and then completed the cross-border fund transfer through platform transactions, essentially engaging in disguised foreign exchange trading and profiting from it. According to the report, the total illegal business activities of the gang amounted to over 1.182 billion yuan, of which five members, including Xia and Bao, participated in activities ranging from over 149 million yuan to over 469 million yuan. On March 21, 2025, the Haidian District People's Court of Beijing issued a first-instance verdict, sentencing all five defendants to prison terms ranging from two to four years for the crime of illegal business operations, and imposing corresponding fines.
Share
2025/10/29 09:42