The post Peter Brandt Throws Jab at Biggest Bitcoin (BTC) Critic as Gold Plunges Deeply appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Veteran crypto trader Peter Brandt has taken to X (formerly Twitter) to provide a brief analysis of gold’s long-term performance while highlighting the many long and painful waiting periods that pro-gold advocate and Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff has had to endure over the years. The post, issued on Wednesday, October 22, saw Brandt take a playful jab at Schiff as gold suddenly flipped negative over the last day, facing a sharp correction from its recent record highs. Another waiting period? Following Brandt’s criticism of the sudden gold dump, he shared a historical gold chart suggesting that the asset has put its investors through a tough investment journey filled with long seclusion periods. The data shows that gold has continued to record deep and long-lasting consolidations, even though it has averaged a 3.6% annual return over the past 45 years. This trend is particularly evident in gold’s price trajectory during the 1980s. The chart reveals that it took gold 28 long years to retest the high it achieved after a massive spike in March 1980. A few years later, gold investors faced yet another long and painful seclusion period after the asset recorded a new high in September 2011. After hitting this peak, gold experienced a prolonged crash, taking about 13 years to break even again, forcing investors to wait that long before reclaiming profits. GoldAverage annual ROR = <4%In Mar 1980 Gold made a high. @PeterSchiff had to then wait 28 years to be bailed outIn Sep 2011 Gold made a high. This time PS needed less than 13 years to pound his chest again How many years will PS now go into seclusion? Care to guess? Yet, a… pic.twitter.com/b7hoWuz5cX — Peter Brandt (@PeterLBrandt) October 22, 2025 It now appears that gold may be replaying these unfavorable trends, as it… The post Peter Brandt Throws Jab at Biggest Bitcoin (BTC) Critic as Gold Plunges Deeply appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Veteran crypto trader Peter Brandt has taken to X (formerly Twitter) to provide a brief analysis of gold’s long-term performance while highlighting the many long and painful waiting periods that pro-gold advocate and Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff has had to endure over the years. The post, issued on Wednesday, October 22, saw Brandt take a playful jab at Schiff as gold suddenly flipped negative over the last day, facing a sharp correction from its recent record highs. Another waiting period? Following Brandt’s criticism of the sudden gold dump, he shared a historical gold chart suggesting that the asset has put its investors through a tough investment journey filled with long seclusion periods. The data shows that gold has continued to record deep and long-lasting consolidations, even though it has averaged a 3.6% annual return over the past 45 years. This trend is particularly evident in gold’s price trajectory during the 1980s. The chart reveals that it took gold 28 long years to retest the high it achieved after a massive spike in March 1980. A few years later, gold investors faced yet another long and painful seclusion period after the asset recorded a new high in September 2011. After hitting this peak, gold experienced a prolonged crash, taking about 13 years to break even again, forcing investors to wait that long before reclaiming profits. GoldAverage annual ROR = <4%In Mar 1980 Gold made a high. @PeterSchiff had to then wait 28 years to be bailed outIn Sep 2011 Gold made a high. This time PS needed less than 13 years to pound his chest again How many years will PS now go into seclusion? Care to guess? Yet, a… pic.twitter.com/b7hoWuz5cX — Peter Brandt (@PeterLBrandt) October 22, 2025 It now appears that gold may be replaying these unfavorable trends, as it…

Peter Brandt Throws Jab at Biggest Bitcoin (BTC) Critic as Gold Plunges Deeply

2025/10/23 20:29

Veteran crypto trader Peter Brandt has taken to X (formerly Twitter) to provide a brief analysis of gold’s long-term performance while highlighting the many long and painful waiting periods that pro-gold advocate and Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff has had to endure over the years.

The post, issued on Wednesday, October 22, saw Brandt take a playful jab at Schiff as gold suddenly flipped negative over the last day, facing a sharp correction from its recent record highs.

Another waiting period?

Following Brandt’s criticism of the sudden gold dump, he shared a historical gold chart suggesting that the asset has put its investors through a tough investment journey filled with long seclusion periods.

The data shows that gold has continued to record deep and long-lasting consolidations, even though it has averaged a 3.6% annual return over the past 45 years.

This trend is particularly evident in gold’s price trajectory during the 1980s. The chart reveals that it took gold 28 long years to retest the high it achieved after a massive spike in March 1980.

A few years later, gold investors faced yet another long and painful seclusion period after the asset recorded a new high in September 2011.

After hitting this peak, gold experienced a prolonged crash, taking about 13 years to break even again, forcing investors to wait that long before reclaiming profits.

It now appears that gold may be replaying these unfavorable trends, as it has begun plunging deep into the red zone shortly after surpassing $4,000. Brandt highlighted this in his post, trolling Schiff for his endurance over the years and raising a mocking question about how many years Schiff will now go into “seclusion.”

Commentators largely agreed with Brandt’s take, emphasizing that his analysis demonstrates how even traditionally “safe haven” assets like gold can take decades to recover or break even.

As such, many commentators consider Bitcoin a better long-term investment option—despite the heavy criticism it often receives during its correction periods.

Source: https://u.today/peter-brandt-throws-jab-at-biggest-bitcoin-btc-critic-as-gold-plunges-deeply

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Dubizzle Pauses IPO After Strong 75% Revenue Growth, Eyes Right Market Moment

Dubizzle Pauses IPO After Strong 75% Revenue Growth, Eyes Right Market Moment

The decision by Dubizzle to delay its IPO highlights a new phase of maturity for Gulf capital markets.
Share
Crypto Breaking News2025/10/29 17:35