The post Sixers, Quentin Grimes Would Both Lose If He Accepts $8.7 Million Qualifying Offer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA – FEBRUARY 11: Quentin Grimes #5 of the Philadelphia 76ers looks on against the Toronto Raptors at the Wells Fargo Center on February 11, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Raptors defeated the 76ers 106-103. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images) Getty Images It’s appearing increasingly unlikely that the Philadelphia 76ers will sign Quentin Grimes to a long-term contract this offseason, according to multiple reports. On Wednesday, Tony Jones of The Athletic reported Grimes had “two offers on the table”—his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer, and a “one-year balloon payment” which would require him to waive his implicit no-trade clause. Grimes’ agent, David Bauman, later told Gina Mizell of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Sixers had also offered Grimes a four-year, $39 million contract, which a Sixers source “strongly refuted” to Mizell. League sources told Michael Scotto of HoopsHype that because of “the wide gap in evaluation,” it’s “highly unlikely” that Grimes and the Sixers will come to an agreement on a long-term deal. Scotto added that for Grimes to “waive his no-trade clause flexibility on any one-year deal, Philadelphia’s offer would preferably somewhere north of the non-taxpayer mid-level exception ($14 million) and $19 million range.” Otherwise, Grimes will “strongly consider” signing his qualifying offer “and retaining his no-trade clause flexibility.” Grimes’ qualifying offer will automatically expire on Oct. 1, so he and the Sixers only have a few more days to hash out terms either on a one-year deal or a long-term contract. Both he and the Sixers should be motivated to avoid the qualifying offer at all costs, as it’s a lose-lose scenario for both sides. Why Grimes Shouldn’t… The post Sixers, Quentin Grimes Would Both Lose If He Accepts $8.7 Million Qualifying Offer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA – FEBRUARY 11: Quentin Grimes #5 of the Philadelphia 76ers looks on against the Toronto Raptors at the Wells Fargo Center on February 11, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Raptors defeated the 76ers 106-103. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images) Getty Images It’s appearing increasingly unlikely that the Philadelphia 76ers will sign Quentin Grimes to a long-term contract this offseason, according to multiple reports. On Wednesday, Tony Jones of The Athletic reported Grimes had “two offers on the table”—his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer, and a “one-year balloon payment” which would require him to waive his implicit no-trade clause. Grimes’ agent, David Bauman, later told Gina Mizell of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Sixers had also offered Grimes a four-year, $39 million contract, which a Sixers source “strongly refuted” to Mizell. League sources told Michael Scotto of HoopsHype that because of “the wide gap in evaluation,” it’s “highly unlikely” that Grimes and the Sixers will come to an agreement on a long-term deal. Scotto added that for Grimes to “waive his no-trade clause flexibility on any one-year deal, Philadelphia’s offer would preferably somewhere north of the non-taxpayer mid-level exception ($14 million) and $19 million range.” Otherwise, Grimes will “strongly consider” signing his qualifying offer “and retaining his no-trade clause flexibility.” Grimes’ qualifying offer will automatically expire on Oct. 1, so he and the Sixers only have a few more days to hash out terms either on a one-year deal or a long-term contract. Both he and the Sixers should be motivated to avoid the qualifying offer at all costs, as it’s a lose-lose scenario for both sides. Why Grimes Shouldn’t…

Sixers, Quentin Grimes Would Both Lose If He Accepts $8.7 Million Qualifying Offer

2025/09/27 21:10

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA – FEBRUARY 11: Quentin Grimes #5 of the Philadelphia 76ers looks on against the Toronto Raptors at the Wells Fargo Center on February 11, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Raptors defeated the 76ers 106-103. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images)

Getty Images

It’s appearing increasingly unlikely that the Philadelphia 76ers will sign Quentin Grimes to a long-term contract this offseason, according to multiple reports.

On Wednesday, Tony Jones of The Athletic reported Grimes had “two offers on the table”—his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer, and a “one-year balloon payment” which would require him to waive his implicit no-trade clause. Grimes’ agent, David Bauman, later told Gina Mizell of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Sixers had also offered Grimes a four-year, $39 million contract, which a Sixers source “strongly refuted” to Mizell.

League sources told Michael Scotto of HoopsHype that because of “the wide gap in evaluation,” it’s “highly unlikely” that Grimes and the Sixers will come to an agreement on a long-term deal. Scotto added that for Grimes to “waive his no-trade clause flexibility on any one-year deal, Philadelphia’s offer would preferably somewhere north of the non-taxpayer mid-level exception ($14 million) and $19 million range.” Otherwise, Grimes will “strongly consider” signing his qualifying offer “and retaining his no-trade clause flexibility.”

Grimes’ qualifying offer will automatically expire on Oct. 1, so he and the Sixers only have a few more days to hash out terms either on a one-year deal or a long-term contract. Both he and the Sixers should be motivated to avoid the qualifying offer at all costs, as it’s a lose-lose scenario for both sides.

Why Grimes Shouldn’t Want The Qualifying Offer

If Grimes does accept the qualifying offer, he’ll have the right to veto any trade involving him this season. That’s because he would lose his Bird rights if he does get traded, which could hamper his new team’s ability to re-sign him in free agency next summer.

When a team has Bird rights on a free agent, it can re-sign him to anything up to a maximum contract even if it’s over the salary cap. But if Grimes gets traded after accepting his qualifying offer, his new team will only have non-Bird rights on him. His new team therefore couldn’t offer him more than 120% of the value of his qualifying offer (roughly $10.4 million) as the starting salary of his next contract, unless it used a separate salary-cap exception (such as the non-taxpayer mid-level exception) on him.

Bauman told Mizell that he believed Grimes “should command $20-25 million annually” on his next contract. Unless his new team had enough cap space to re-sign him to a contract starting at that figure, he’d have to leave after one season to command that type of a payday. Any team interested in trading for him thus might not be willing to give up much since it could face realistic competition for him next summer without his Bird rights.

Maintaining the right to veto any trade would give Grimes full control over his future. If nothing else, he could refuse to accept any trade, stay in Philadelphia for the season and then test his luck as an unrestricted free agent next summer. The Sixers would still have his Bird rights at that point, which could give them an advantage in free agency.

But if Grimes is looking for a fresh start elsewhere, the qualifying offer might not be his best path out of Philadelphia.

Why The Sixers Shouldn’t Want The Qualifying Offer

If Grimes takes the qualifying offer, the Sixers will be roughly $1.1 million under the $195.9 million first apron with 14 players under standard contract. They’d also still have his Bird rights next summer if they didn’t trade him before then. That’s about where the good news ends, though.

Since Grimes’ Bird rights wouldn’t travel with him in a trade, that could tamp down overall trade interest in him. Even if they found a team that wanted to trade for him, his $8.7 million contract would limit how much salary they could receive in a deal.

If the Sixers cross the first apron at any point this season, they won’t be allowed to take back more salary than they send out in a trade. If they do take back more salary than they send out, they’ll be hard-capped at the first apron through June 30, 2026, which means they couldn’t cross that threshold under any circumstances.

The Sixers could package Kelly Oubre Jr. ($8.4 million) or Andre Drummond ($5.0 million) with Grimes to take back a larger contract, but they wouldn’t be able to receive someone in the $20-25 million range without swinging a 3-for-1 deal or trading one of Joel Embiid, Paul George or Tyrese Maxey. If they signed Grimes to a one-year balloon deal in the $15-20 million range, they’d give themselves far more trade flexibility, although they’d also push themselves well above the first apron and close to the $207.8 million second apron.

Even if they sign Grimes to a one-year balloon deal, he’d still lose his Bird rights if he agreed to a trade. However, his non-Bird rights would have more value if he’s on a larger contract, as his new team could offer him far more in free agency than it could on the qualifying offer.

Signing Grimes to a larger one-year contract would cost the Sixers more in luxury tax, although they’d still have a few months to cut down on their tax bill. Even if Grimes isn’t wiling to waive his implicit no-trade clause with such a deal, a larger contract should make him more appealing from a trade perspective than if he picks up the qualifying offer.

Both sides may still be posturing ahead of the Oct. 1 deadline, although there’s only a few days left for them to reach a resolution. Either way, the qualifying offer is a nuclear option that wouldn’t benefit Grimes or the Sixers. They both have incentive to avoid that at all costs.

Unless otherwise noted, all stats via NBA.com, PBPStats, Cleaning the Glass or Basketball Reference. All salary information via Spotrac and salary-cap information via RealGM. All odds via FanDuel Sportsbook.

Follow Bryan on Bluesky.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2025/09/27/sixers-quentin-grimes-would-both-lose-if-he-accepts-87-million-qualifying-offer/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Latest Ripple News As CEO Says XRP ETFs Inevitable By 2026 and XRP Price Prediction

Latest Ripple News As CEO Says XRP ETFs Inevitable By 2026 and XRP Price Prediction

The post Latest Ripple News As CEO Says XRP ETFs Inevitable By 2026 and XRP Price Prediction appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple news is back in the spotlight, and the excitement around it is growing. Some analysts believe 2025 to be the breakout year XRP has been waiting for while some believe Layer Brett is the token to invest in. Let’s take a closer look at the latest Ripple news and what analysts are saying about XRP’s price prediction. Ripple news: Garlinghouse predicts XRP ETF approval Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, recently spoke to Bloomberg, where he made a bold prediction: the SEC will approve XRP ETFs by the end of 2025. Several institutions, including Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, and Canary, have already filed for an XRP ETF, signaling a growing interest in XRP from big players in the financial world. This approval seems increasingly likely, with Polymarket data showing a 96% chance of approval, up from 65% earlier this year. Experts like James Seyffart and Eric Balchunas have also backed this optimistic outlook. If the ETF gets the green light, billions in capital could flow into XRP, pushing its price higher. XRP price prediction: Is a breakout coming for Ripple’s token? XRP’s price is hovering around $3.02, but there’s a strong belief that it could go much higher. Analysts are looking at key levels of resistance, with the first big target being $3.67. If XRP breaks past that, it could head toward $5, which would represent a significant move from its current price. Historically, XRP has done well when liquidity increases in the market, and with institutional interest growing, there’s a good chance the price will move upwards. The top token really catching investors attention: Layer Brett While XRP is generating plenty of excitement, there’s another coin that investors are starting to pay attention to: Layer Brett ($LBRETT). Layer Brett is a next-generation Ethereum-based Layer 2 meme coin, and it’s making a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 22:12
Crypto On Alert: Raoul Pal Hints At Macro Twist Post-US Govt Shutdown

Crypto On Alert: Raoul Pal Hints At Macro Twist Post-US Govt Shutdown

As the latest US government shutdown ends and markets refocus on macro plumbing, Raoul Pal has sketched out a strikingly liquidity-heavy roadmap on X – one that, in his framework, has direct implications for crypto. “So now the US Gov has reopened, what’s next?” Pal asks. He immediately points to the Treasury General Account (TGA): “Expect a few days for TGA spending to begin to significantly add to liquidity and should persist for several months.Obviously, QT ends in Dec and the balance sheet will crawl higher. We should see the dollar begin to weaken again.” Mechanically, TGA drawdowns push cash back into bank reserves and money markets, reversing the reserve drain that built up while the government was partially shut. At the same time, the Federal Reserve has already confirmed that quantitative tightening (QT) will end on December 1, 2025, shifting from active balance-sheet reduction to full reinvestment of maturing Treasuries and a more “maintenance” stance. When Will Crypto Prices Rise Again? Pal’s point is that both channels tilt the system toward more dollars sloshing through funding markets, a backdrop he has long argued is constructive for risk assets, including crypto. The near-term risk, in his view, is a classic year-end funding squeeze. “The next key step is to avoid a Year End funding squeeze. Expect several ‘temporary’ measures to add liquidity. Term Funding and SRF operations are most likely.” Related Reading: SEC Chair Sets Out Plans For Crypto Taxonomy To Define Digital Asset Classification Here he is referring to term repo or funding facilities and the Standing Repo Facility (SRF), which the Fed can scale up to backstop banks’ access to cash if overnight rates spike. That reading aligns with recent Fed communication that elevated SRF usage and tighter money-market conditions were central reasons for ending QT early. Pal then escalates from tactical tools to structural regulation: “That will eventually morph into the desperately needed changes to the SLR to allow banks to absorb more issuance and re-lever their balance sheets. This is a big liquidity bazooka. Expect in Q1. SLR should lower rates as banks buy more bonds.” The Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) caps large banks’ overall balance-sheet size, regardless of asset risk. Loosening it for Treasuries and reserves has been debated for years as a way to let dealers warehouse more government debt without breaching constraints. If regulators move in that direction, it would, as Pal notes, free capacity for banks to buy more bonds and could exert downward pressure on yields—again easing financial conditions. Related Reading: The 2025 Year-End Crypto Outlook: The Catalysts That Will Decide Everything For crypto, that matters indirectly: Pal’s core macro thesis is that improving liquidity and lower real yields are the primary tailwinds for digital assets. Regulation is explicitly on his radar too: “Also expect CLARITY Act for crypto to begin to get finalized.” The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (“CLARITY Act”) has already passed the US House and is now before the Senate. It would define digital asset categories and divide oversight between the CFTC and SEC, replacing much of the current “regulation by enforcement” model. Pal’s remark signals his expectation that the shutdown’s end clears the way for renewed legislative momentum – a key piece of the institutional puzzle for non-bitcoin crypto. He closes by broadening the lens to global and fiscal policy: “There will also be stimulus payments and the Big Beautiful Bill fiscal goosing. China will continue balance sheet expansion. Europe will add fiscal stimulus or extra spending. The debts must be rolled and the Gov wants to super heat the economy into the Mid-Terms. This is the Liquidity Flood…. the spice must flow.” Taken together, Pal is describing a synchronised regime: post-shutdown TGA spending, the end of QT, potential SLR relief, progressing US crypto legislation, and ongoing fiscal and monetary support in China and Europe. For crypto investors who share his liquidity-centric lens, the message is not subtle: the macro “spice,” in his view, is about to flow again. At press time, the total crypto market cap dropped to $3.24 trillion. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/11/14 22:00