DeFi lending protocol Suilend has taken precautionary measures in response to a major loss reported by Stream Finance, which is having ripple effects in the Sui ecosystem.  One of the worst hit was Elixir, a protocol that appears to have borrowed against assets linked to Stream Finance’s xUSD, a dollar-pegged stablecoin-like asset.  Suilend takes action […]DeFi lending protocol Suilend has taken precautionary measures in response to a major loss reported by Stream Finance, which is having ripple effects in the Sui ecosystem.  One of the worst hit was Elixir, a protocol that appears to have borrowed against assets linked to Stream Finance’s xUSD, a dollar-pegged stablecoin-like asset.  Suilend takes action […]

Suilend pauses deposits and withdrawals specifically in its Elixir Isolated Market in response to a major loss reported by Stream Finance

2025/11/05 02:50

DeFi lending protocol Suilend has taken precautionary measures in response to a major loss reported by Stream Finance, which is having ripple effects in the Sui ecosystem. 

One of the worst hit was Elixir, a protocol that appears to have borrowed against assets linked to Stream Finance’s xUSD, a dollar-pegged stablecoin-like asset. 

Suilend takes action against Elixir

A few hours after Stream Finance announced that it had taken a huge loss, Suilend posted an update on X, assuring users that the team was keeping a close eye on the developing issue affecting Elixir’s deUSD.

The post also stated that deposits and withdrawals in the Elixir Isolated Market have been paused, and communications have been attempted as Suilend demands loan repayment. 

In the meantime, the team says that “all other Suilend markets are unaffected and remain safe.” The post directly quoted the post from Stream Finance that contained information about the huge loss it had taken.

According to the post, the loss occurred through an external fund manager overseeing Stream funds, and the total amount lost was approximately $93 million in Stream fund assets, as Cryptopolitan reported earlier today. 

Stream Finance’s community suspects that the fund manager may have used customer deposits for risky investments, as the protocol has not shared any evidence of a hack or external malicious attacks. 

This suggests that the problem may have been internal, and Stream has responded by engaging the services of Keith Miller and Joseph Cutler of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP to look into the incident thoroughly and initiate a withdrawal of all liquid assets, a process that is expected to be completed in the near term.

“To keep our stakeholders informed, we will provide periodic updates as additional information becomes available,” the post read. “Until we are able to fully assess the scope and causes of the loss, all withdrawals and deposits will be temporarily suspended. Any pending deposits will not be processed at this time.”

Stream Finance has called its decision to retain Perkins Coie LLP proof of the platform’s unwavering commitment to transparency and robust corporate governance. Elixir has also responded to the Stream debacle with a post claiming, “Elixir has full redemption rights at $1 with Stream for its lending position.”

“We are the only creditor with these 1-1 rights,” the team has boasted, while declaring that deUSD remains fully backed as Elixir begins the process of unwinding its lending position to Stream, alongside the team.

The DeFi industry has faced significant losses this year. 

Reports claim that the loss Stream Finance endured came less than 24 hours after another yield-focused DeFi protocol, known as Balancer, faced exploits across multiple chains that led to a loss of over $100 million. 

The co-founder and CEO of Trading Strategy, Mikko Ohtamaa, has suggested that the fault lies with a defective smart contract, as concurrent transactions had been altering internal balance accounting.

The exploit is being floated as one of the biggest DeFi hacks this year and comes days after a smaller theft of $5.5 million from the Garden Finance bridge. Small exploits like that don’t often make headlines, but the losses add up, painting a grim picture of what has been going on in the DeFi sector this year.

According to a Peckshield report, 20 major DeFi platforms were exploited in September alone, which led to a collective loss of over $127 million, a 22% decline from August’s loss of $163 million. Meanwhile, total DeFi-related losses in 2025 have now crossed $3 billion, with the Bunni DEX being one of the biggest losers. 

Unlike the other platforms that are still able to operate and take steps to fix the damage, the Bunni DEX completely shut down after it reportedly lost over $8 million to hackers and lost the ability to cover new security audit costs.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Solana Treasury Firm Forward Industries Launches $1 Billion Buyback, Files SEC Resale Prospectus

Solana Treasury Firm Forward Industries Launches $1 Billion Buyback, Files SEC Resale Prospectus

Forward Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORD) has moved to reinforce investor confidence with two major corporate actions. The Solana-focused treasury firm announced a new $1 billion share repurchase authorization and confirmed the filing of a resale prospectus supplement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These decisions reflect a strong strategic conviction as the company continues to expand its Solana-related operations and capital market initiatives.Share Buyback Reflects Long-Term ConfidenceAs per the issued press release, the Board of Directors approved the $1 billion buyback program on November 3, 2025. The plan allows Forward Industries to purchase its common stock through open-market transactions, private deals, or accelerated share repurchases. According to the company, the program provides flexibility to act on favorable market conditions while ensuring compliance with SEC Rule 10b-18.Chairman Kyle Samani stated, “Today’s announcement reflects our confidence in both Forward Industries’ differentiated strategy and the underlying strength of Solana’s ecosystem.” He added that the initiative underscores the company’s long-term view, saying it “gives us flexibility to return capital to shareholders when we believe our stock trades below intrinsic value.”The program will remain active until September 30, 2027, unless modified or terminated earlier. The company indicated that the timing and volume of repurchases would depend on share price, liquidity, and overall market conditions.Filing of Resale Prospectus and Market ImplicationsIn tandem, Forward Industries filed a resale prospectus supplement to register certain shares from its September 2025 private placement. The filing permits selling shareholders to trade those securities at their discretion. The company clarified that it will not receive any proceeds from those resales.Market observers noted that the timing of both actions signals confidence in the firm’s balance sheet and the Solana ecosystem’s potential for institutional adoption. The buyback authorization, alongside the resale filing, positions Forward Industries to stabilize its stock performance while maintaining strategic liquidity.Market Reaction and Price OutlookSource: Google FinanceDespite the strategic developments, the company’s stock fell 24.75%as of press time, closing at $10.52. The decline from its $13.98 opening price reflected strong selling pressure and short-term investor caution. Analysts suggest that traders may have responded to profit-taking following recent gains or uncertainty surrounding the resale filing. Unless the price stabilizes above $11, further downside toward the $10 psychological support level remains possible.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/05 04:53