A single mistyped command erased Toy Story 2 from existence in 1998. Pixar's backup system had quietly failed weeks earlier. Backup from a mother's laptop allowed the team to recover nearly everything that was lost.A single mistyped command erased Toy Story 2 from existence in 1998. Pixar's backup system had quietly failed weeks earlier. Backup from a mother's laptop allowed the team to recover nearly everything that was lost.

To Infinity… and Delete

2025/10/30 04:34

In 1998, disaster struck at Pixar. A single mistyped command — rm -rf / — began erasing Toy Story 2 from existence. Character by character, scene by scene, the movie that had taken a year to build vanished in seconds. The team watched in disbelief as Woody’s hat, Buzz’s wings, and entire sets disappeared before their eyes. When engineers rushed to restore from backups, they discovered something worse — the backup system had quietly failed weeks earlier. As IT professionals, we have all been there before, but what can we learn from this and get Buzz to his ship on time?

Andy’s Party

This “Core memory” took place in 1998, with Pixar co-founder Ed Catmull remembering it in his book called “Creativity, Inc.”. The story begins with an unfortunate, unnamed Pixar employee who was doing some routine file clearance on internal servers when they accidentally entered a deletion command on Toy Story 2's root folder…That’s some good news. This “Updating your resume event” resulted in character models and assets disappearing, and the file servers were quickly shut down.

\ Unfortunately, by that point, around 90% of the work done on Toy Story 2 was gone, and the sequel's backup system was not working properly for around a month either. At this point, Toy Story 2 would either have to start from scratch - or production would be scrapped altogether.

A Mother Saves the Day

A mother saves the day, just like when Buzz and Woody team up to get home. Galyn Susman, the film’s technical direction supervisor, who would be affected by Disney’s layoffs in 2023, had a copy of the Toy Story project at home. Galyn was on maternity leave and decided to continue working from home – something that is seen as normal today - but at the time, taboo. Being a mother and always planning ahead, just like having children, made it a point to take her work home once a week. This was a huge benefit because it allowed her to stay updated and maintain a reliable backup of Toy Story 2.

\ Just like a newborn baby, Pixar carefully transported the laptop back to the office, cradled and wrapped in blankets during the car ride - I imagine they even played lullaby music for the laptop…or maybe that is something I would do. Having the backup from Susman’s laptop allowed the team to copy the files and recover nearly everything that had been lost.

\ It was a joyous occasion with many high fives, and maybe put a smile on the face of the person responsible for the deletion. Susman’s backup copy didn’t have the entire movie on her computer, but they were able to retrieve enough to complete and deliver Toy Story 2 on time. Queue the inspirational music and dance like nobody is watching. What a story, right?

\ What about the employee who deleted the files? I am glad you are paying attention. So far, there are no reports of them being fired or facing consequences. I will say it’s easy to imagine the tension at the time, and maybe a future project with them working on the backup process.

Lessons Learned

The experience serves as a valuable lesson, not just for the Pixar folks but for IT professionals worldwide. There is a strong commitment to create multiple backups and implement extra security measures to prevent such incidents from happening again.

\ In this story, the backup system had failed months earlier, and nobody noticed. That meant there weren’t any backups to restore from, and business was at a standstill. Does that sound familiar to today’s events? It should because it happens a lot these days. What can businesses do to keep safe from this disaster?

Backups

  • The 3-2-1 rule - data backup rule is a strategy that recommends keeping three copies of your data, on two different types of storage media, with one copy stored offsite. This method ensures redundancy and protects data from a single point of failure, such as hardware failure, theft, or a local disaster.

    \

  • Offsite backups - An offsite, air-gapped data backup stores a copy of your data in a separate physical or cloud location (offsite) and keeps it disconnected from your primary network (air-gapped). This combination protects your data from localized disasters and cyber threats like ransomware, which cannot remotely access or corrupt the air-gapped backup copy.

    \

  • RPO & RTO - Recovery Point Objective and Recovery Time Objective. It’s not just important, but vital to your business continuity and survival in the event of a disaster. Most businesses state that they have backups tested and that pass the audits, but when they have to restore their systems when a disaster happens, it takes a lot longer than they had planned, and the business loses money because of it.

Technical Controls and Permissions: Restricted Folder Deletion Privileges.

  • The simplest prevention would have been to set permissions on the server so that not all employees could delete the top-level directory for the movie. Granting "full control" access to a large group of users is common in collaborative environments, but it is a major security risk. Only a small number of administrators should have the permission to run "delete" commands on critical, high-level folders.

\

  • Command-level restrictions. The employee used the rm -r Linux command, which deletes a directory and all its contents recursively. A more advanced system could have prevented this command from running at the highest project directory level, either with a special script or by requiring a second authentication step.

    \

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

“Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem

“Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem

Circle’s new project, ARC Testnet, has caught the financial world’s attention for one reason: the list of participants is staggering. BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Visa, Mastercard, and Deutsche Bank are all tied in. But the real breakthrough lies in a simple innovation, USD-denominated gas fees. By allowing blockchain transactions to be paid directly in dollars rather than volatile crypto, Circle may have just eliminated the final obstacle keeping $29 trillion in global pension funds out of the digital asset markets. For years, institutional investors have hesitated to enter crypto not because of lack of infrastructure, but because of operational risk tied to crypto-denominated fees and fluctuating assets. Circle’s ARC testnet bypasses that entirely, creating a compliance-friendly environment where gas can be paid in stablecoins. This seemingly small detail creates massive implications. Suddenly, large funds can settle, custody, and transact entirely within a digital framework that still operates in fiat terms. That’s an open invitation for financial institutions that already manage tens of trillions in traditional markets. While ARC mainnet is not expected until 2026, insiders say budget allocations for pilot programs are already happening now. Financial institutions are treating ARC preparedness as a 2025 line item. The timing could not be more strategic given that Circle’s anticipated IPO will require a strong growth narrative. By positioning ARC as the missing layer between traditional money and blockchain efficiency, Circle is painting itself as the company that can finally merge the financial system’s past and future. If the rollout continues smoothly, the stablecoin issuer could pivot from utility provider to infrastructure backbone for institutional crypto adoption. Circle’s pitch isn’t about speculation anymore, it’s about owning the rails of the next global financial upgrade. “Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/10/30 14:46
Speculation as Culture

Speculation as Culture

We used to build things because we believed in them. Now, we build because someone might buy them. Speculation isn’t just a financial behavior anymore — it’s a cultural operating system. From crypto tokens to content virality to design trends, we live in a world where potential value has replaced real value. Everything is a pre-launch, a teaser, a drop. Even ideas are traded like assets, inflated with hype before they ever mature. Web3 was supposed to decentralize ownership, but what it really decentralized was attention. We all became investors in narratives. Every creator is now a startup; every tweet is an IPO. The new capitalism isn’t about production — it’s about participation in momentum. The problem? Momentum doesn’t create meaning. Design has absorbed this sickness too. Products are released half-finished, optimized for FOMO instead of function. Brands trade authenticity for aesthetics that look “investable.” And creatives — once obsessed with craft — are now caught in loops of engagement farming. It’s not “What did you make?” anymore. It’s “How many noticed before it was over?” Speculation rewards velocity, not vision. It turns creativity into a casino, where we keep betting on our own relevance. Even the language of art has shifted — “drops,” “floor price,” “community alpha.” We stopped talking about what something means and started asking what it’s worth. This economy of anticipation keeps us in a constant state of almost. We’re always on the verge of the next thing — but nothing lands, nothing lingers. Attention, like capital, has become liquidity. To create meaning again, design has to resist this speculative loop. It has to slow down, to reclaim patience as a form of rebellion. The future shouldn’t just be bought early — it should be built deliberately. Because right now, speculation is our culture’s addiction. And the house always wins. Speculation as Culture was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/10/30 14:46