A month after the iPhone 17 Pro launch, HackerNoon readers weighed in—and the verdict’s mixed. One in three voters praised the AI-powered front camera, while others dismissed the phone as “refined but uninspired.” Across the web, sentiment mirrors this fatigue: fans admire Apple’s polish but want bolder innovation. Polls on Polymarket and Kalshi show only 4% expect a foldable iPhone in 2025, though 70% anticipate one by 2027. In short: Apple’s still leading, but people are ready for a surprise.A month after the iPhone 17 Pro launch, HackerNoon readers weighed in—and the verdict’s mixed. One in three voters praised the AI-powered front camera, while others dismissed the phone as “refined but uninspired.” Across the web, sentiment mirrors this fatigue: fans admire Apple’s polish but want bolder innovation. Polls on Polymarket and Kalshi show only 4% expect a foldable iPhone in 2025, though 70% anticipate one by 2027. In short: Apple’s still leading, but people are ready for a surprise.

What Do iPhone Users Want Next?

2025/10/30 01:41

Welcome back to 3 Tech Polls, HackerNoon's brand-new Weekly Newsletter that curates Results from our Poll of the Week, and 2 related polls around the web.

Thanks for voting and helping us shape these important conversations!

This week, we’re talking about iPhones — Apple’s latest flagship, the iPhone 17 Pro, and what users expect from the smartphone pioneer moving forward.

About a month after Apple released its latest flagship, we decided to find out how our readers feel about the newest entry from a company that critics accuse of marketing ‘basic’ features as ‘breakthroughs’.

This Week’s Poll Results (HackerNoon)

What's the most eye-catching new thing about the iPhone 17 Pro?

iPhone 17 Pro just dropped and it’s wild. The screen hits 3000 nits — you can actually use it outside. Every rear camera is 48MP now, even the zoom one, so 8x optical shots look insane. Front camera? 18MP with AI that follows your face like it’s in love with you. Battery lasts 33 hours of video. No more “low battery” panic at 9 PM. A19 Pro chip stays cool under pressure, and it starts at 256GB. Oh, and it comes in Cosmic Orange — yeah, it’s loud on purpose.

1 in 3 respondents (33 %) voted for the upgraded 18 MP front camera with AI auto-framing as the standout feature.

Not everyone’s impressed, though.

Others were more blunt:

\ While the camera dominated attention, a noticeable share of readers said they were more intrigued by the all-aluminum redesign in new colors like Cosmic Orange, which many described as Apple’s most confident aesthetic move in years. Others leaned toward the ProRes RAW video and 40× zoom, praising the phone’s creative potential for filmmaking, even if it still “feels more like refinement than reinvention.” A smaller but vocal group highlighted the 12 GB RAM upgrade, arguing that sustained performance finally puts iPhones on par with flagship Androids.

If our readers’ responses are anything to go by, Apple’s newest flagship may be as refined as ever. But refinement alone isn’t cutting it, not anymore. And that sentiment isn’t limited to HackerNoon readers. Across the web, people are wondering whether Apple is still willing to surprise us.

:::tip Weigh in on the Poll Results here.

:::

\

Around the Web: Polymarket Pick

Will Apple release a foldable iPhone in 2025?

Current odds: 4% Chance

As the image below illustrates, odds dropped sharply after the iPhone 17 was released, considering Apple’s predictable release cycle. Up until that point, users held out hope for something a little more…imaginative from the Cupertino giant.

Around the Web: Kalshi Pick

When will Apple announce foldable iPhone?

Current odds:

  • Before 2026 - 4%

  • Before 2027 - 70%

\ With the 2025 release cycle already behind us, attention has shifted to 2026. Roughly 70 % of respondents on Kalshi now expect Apple to finally give in to market pressure and enter the foldable smartphone space before 2027.

Across all three polls, the sentiment is clear: users think the new iPhone 17 is solid — but they’re hoping to see braver moves in the next cycle from the trillion-dollar smartphone pioneer.


We want to hear from you!

That’s it, folks! We’ll be back next week with more data, more debates, and more donut charts!

In the meantime:

:::tip Vote on this week’s poll: What’s more likely to disrupt Hollywood first?

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

“Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem

“Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem

Circle’s new project, ARC Testnet, has caught the financial world’s attention for one reason: the list of participants is staggering. BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Visa, Mastercard, and Deutsche Bank are all tied in. But the real breakthrough lies in a simple innovation, USD-denominated gas fees. By allowing blockchain transactions to be paid directly in dollars rather than volatile crypto, Circle may have just eliminated the final obstacle keeping $29 trillion in global pension funds out of the digital asset markets. For years, institutional investors have hesitated to enter crypto not because of lack of infrastructure, but because of operational risk tied to crypto-denominated fees and fluctuating assets. Circle’s ARC testnet bypasses that entirely, creating a compliance-friendly environment where gas can be paid in stablecoins. This seemingly small detail creates massive implications. Suddenly, large funds can settle, custody, and transact entirely within a digital framework that still operates in fiat terms. That’s an open invitation for financial institutions that already manage tens of trillions in traditional markets. While ARC mainnet is not expected until 2026, insiders say budget allocations for pilot programs are already happening now. Financial institutions are treating ARC preparedness as a 2025 line item. The timing could not be more strategic given that Circle’s anticipated IPO will require a strong growth narrative. By positioning ARC as the missing layer between traditional money and blockchain efficiency, Circle is painting itself as the company that can finally merge the financial system’s past and future. If the rollout continues smoothly, the stablecoin issuer could pivot from utility provider to infrastructure backbone for institutional crypto adoption. Circle’s pitch isn’t about speculation anymore, it’s about owning the rails of the next global financial upgrade. “Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/10/30 14:46
Speculation as Culture

Speculation as Culture

We used to build things because we believed in them. Now, we build because someone might buy them. Speculation isn’t just a financial behavior anymore — it’s a cultural operating system. From crypto tokens to content virality to design trends, we live in a world where potential value has replaced real value. Everything is a pre-launch, a teaser, a drop. Even ideas are traded like assets, inflated with hype before they ever mature. Web3 was supposed to decentralize ownership, but what it really decentralized was attention. We all became investors in narratives. Every creator is now a startup; every tweet is an IPO. The new capitalism isn’t about production — it’s about participation in momentum. The problem? Momentum doesn’t create meaning. Design has absorbed this sickness too. Products are released half-finished, optimized for FOMO instead of function. Brands trade authenticity for aesthetics that look “investable.” And creatives — once obsessed with craft — are now caught in loops of engagement farming. It’s not “What did you make?” anymore. It’s “How many noticed before it was over?” Speculation rewards velocity, not vision. It turns creativity into a casino, where we keep betting on our own relevance. Even the language of art has shifted — “drops,” “floor price,” “community alpha.” We stopped talking about what something means and started asking what it’s worth. This economy of anticipation keeps us in a constant state of almost. We’re always on the verge of the next thing — but nothing lands, nothing lingers. Attention, like capital, has become liquidity. To create meaning again, design has to resist this speculative loop. It has to slow down, to reclaim patience as a form of rebellion. The future shouldn’t just be bought early — it should be built deliberately. Because right now, speculation is our culture’s addiction. And the house always wins. Speculation as Culture was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/10/30 14:46