Early this morning Beijing time, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate range to 4.00%–4.25%. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve also stated that quantitative tightening (QT) will officially end on December 1. Logically, this should have been a "positive" development: interest rate cuts, the end of balance sheet reduction, and improved liquidity expectations. However, the result has left many puzzled—why didn't the stock market, cryptocurrencies, or even gold rise, but instead experienced widespread declines? 01. The market's "positive expectations" have already been exhausted. In fact, the market had already "bet" on this rate cut earlier this month. According to CME FedWatch data, prior to the meeting, the market believed: The probability of a 25bp rate cut is as high as 95%, and about 40% of investors expect the Federal Reserve to immediately announce the start of QE (re-expansion of the balance sheet). As a result, the Federal Reserve opted for a "moderate" rate cut. in other words: This interest rate cut is not a "new positive development," but rather "below expectations." When expectations are met but there are no surprises, the market often chooses to take profits. This is a typical "buy the rumor, sell the news" market trend. 02. Stopping the meter reading does not mean starting to release water. Many people, seeing "QT ended," assumed it meant a massive influx of liquidity was coming. However, the Federal Reserve's statement this time was actually very cautious: "We will end the balance sheet reduction, but will not launch a new asset purchase program for the time being." That is to say: The market has shifted from the "collecting water" phase to the "wait and see" phase. In the language of financial markets, this is called: Liquidity has stopped worsening, but it hasn't improved either. For the investment market to rise, simply "stopping the decline" is not enough—it also needs "increased capital." This is currently the biggest gap. 03. The interest rate cut has not translated into "real funding rates". In theory, interest rate cuts should lower short-term rates, leading to lower funding costs. However, this situation is somewhat unusual—although the nominal policy rate has decreased by 25 basis points, medium- and long-term funding costs have not decreased accordingly. For example, the yield on five-year Treasury bonds rose from 3.6% to 3.7%. The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds has surged to over 4%. What does this mean? It means that real liquidity in the market remains tight, and investment institutions have not felt an increase in "money." The Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts are still just talk and haven't actually "flowed into the market." 04. Hidden Concerns Behind the "Interest Rate Cut": Downward Economic Pressure Remains High From a broader perspective, the Federal Reserve's rate cut is actually a "defensive measure." Recent US economic data shows: The real estate and manufacturing sectors experienced negative growth for two consecutive quarters. The job market slowed, and the unemployment rate rose again to 4.6%. Corporate profit growth has almost stagnated. This means that the Federal Reserve has opted for a slight easing of monetary policy to buffer downside risks, choosing between "maintaining growth" and "controlling inflation." But this operation also sends a signal: The US economy may have entered a period of "slow decline". In this situation, the market prefers to lock in profits rather than easily increase its holdings in risky assets. 05. Summary: Interest rate cuts ≠ bull market; liquidity is the core variable. The market's reaction to this interest rate cut actually reveals the clearest logic: Short-term policy easing ≠ ample liquidity ≠ asset price increases. What could truly drive a full-blown reversal in the stock and crypto markets is the central bank restarting asset expansion (QE), or fiscal stimulus coupled with large-scale capital inflows. Before that, interest rate cuts were only "neutral to slightly positive"—enough to stabilize confidence, but not enough to trigger a new bull market. What the market wants is not a 25-point interest rate cut, but a real injection of liquidity. Until then, 'risky assets' will have to wait. Early this morning Beijing time, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate range to 4.00%–4.25%. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve also stated that quantitative tightening (QT) will officially end on December 1. Logically, this should have been a "positive" development: interest rate cuts, the end of balance sheet reduction, and improved liquidity expectations. However, the result has left many puzzled—why didn't the stock market, cryptocurrencies, or even gold rise, but instead experienced widespread declines? 01. The market's "positive expectations" have already been exhausted. In fact, the market had already "bet" on this rate cut earlier this month. According to CME FedWatch data, prior to the meeting, the market believed: The probability of a 25bp rate cut is as high as 95%, and about 40% of investors expect the Federal Reserve to immediately announce the start of QE (re-expansion of the balance sheet). As a result, the Federal Reserve opted for a "moderate" rate cut. in other words: This interest rate cut is not a "new positive development," but rather "below expectations." When expectations are met but there are no surprises, the market often chooses to take profits. This is a typical "buy the rumor, sell the news" market trend. 02. Stopping the meter reading does not mean starting to release water. Many people, seeing "QT ended," assumed it meant a massive influx of liquidity was coming. However, the Federal Reserve's statement this time was actually very cautious: "We will end the balance sheet reduction, but will not launch a new asset purchase program for the time being." That is to say: The market has shifted from the "collecting water" phase to the "wait and see" phase. In the language of financial markets, this is called: Liquidity has stopped worsening, but it hasn't improved either. For the investment market to rise, simply "stopping the decline" is not enough—it also needs "increased capital." This is currently the biggest gap. 03. The interest rate cut has not translated into "real funding rates". In theory, interest rate cuts should lower short-term rates, leading to lower funding costs. However, this situation is somewhat unusual—although the nominal policy rate has decreased by 25 basis points, medium- and long-term funding costs have not decreased accordingly. For example, the yield on five-year Treasury bonds rose from 3.6% to 3.7%. The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds has surged to over 4%. What does this mean? It means that real liquidity in the market remains tight, and investment institutions have not felt an increase in "money." The Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts are still just talk and haven't actually "flowed into the market." 04. Hidden Concerns Behind the "Interest Rate Cut": Downward Economic Pressure Remains High From a broader perspective, the Federal Reserve's rate cut is actually a "defensive measure." Recent US economic data shows: The real estate and manufacturing sectors experienced negative growth for two consecutive quarters. The job market slowed, and the unemployment rate rose again to 4.6%. Corporate profit growth has almost stagnated. This means that the Federal Reserve has opted for a slight easing of monetary policy to buffer downside risks, choosing between "maintaining growth" and "controlling inflation." But this operation also sends a signal: The US economy may have entered a period of "slow decline". In this situation, the market prefers to lock in profits rather than easily increase its holdings in risky assets. 05. Summary: Interest rate cuts ≠ bull market; liquidity is the core variable. The market's reaction to this interest rate cut actually reveals the clearest logic: Short-term policy easing ≠ ample liquidity ≠ asset price increases. What could truly drive a full-blown reversal in the stock and crypto markets is the central bank restarting asset expansion (QE), or fiscal stimulus coupled with large-scale capital inflows. Before that, interest rate cuts were only "neutral to slightly positive"—enough to stabilize confidence, but not enough to trigger a new bull market. What the market wants is not a 25-point interest rate cut, but a real injection of liquidity. Until then, 'risky assets' will have to wait.

Why is the market still falling even after interest rates have been cut?

2025/10/30 10:00

Early this morning Beijing time, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate range to 4.00%–4.25%.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve also stated that quantitative tightening (QT) will officially end on December 1.

Logically, this should have been a "positive" development: interest rate cuts, the end of balance sheet reduction, and improved liquidity expectations. However, the result has left many puzzled—why didn't the stock market, cryptocurrencies, or even gold rise, but instead experienced widespread declines?

01. The market's "positive expectations" have already been exhausted.

In fact, the market had already "bet" on this rate cut earlier this month. According to CME FedWatch data, prior to the meeting, the market believed:

The probability of a 25bp rate cut is as high as 95%, and about 40% of investors expect the Federal Reserve to immediately announce the start of QE (re-expansion of the balance sheet).

As a result, the Federal Reserve opted for a "moderate" rate cut.

in other words:

This interest rate cut is not a "new positive development," but rather "below expectations."

When expectations are met but there are no surprises, the market often chooses to take profits. This is a typical "buy the rumor, sell the news" market trend.

02. Stopping the meter reading does not mean starting to release water.

Many people, seeing "QT ended," assumed it meant a massive influx of liquidity was coming. However, the Federal Reserve's statement this time was actually very cautious:

"We will end the balance sheet reduction, but will not launch a new asset purchase program for the time being."

That is to say:

The market has shifted from the "collecting water" phase to the "wait and see" phase.

In the language of financial markets, this is called:

Liquidity has stopped worsening, but it hasn't improved either.

For the investment market to rise, simply "stopping the decline" is not enough—it also needs "increased capital." This is currently the biggest gap.

03. The interest rate cut has not translated into "real funding rates".

In theory, interest rate cuts should lower short-term rates, leading to lower funding costs. However, this situation is somewhat unusual—although the nominal policy rate has decreased by 25 basis points, medium- and long-term funding costs have not decreased accordingly.

For example, the yield on five-year Treasury bonds rose from 3.6% to 3.7%.

The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds has surged to over 4%.

What does this mean? It means that real liquidity in the market remains tight, and investment institutions have not felt an increase in "money." The Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts are still just talk and haven't actually "flowed into the market."

04. Hidden Concerns Behind the "Interest Rate Cut": Downward Economic Pressure Remains High

From a broader perspective, the Federal Reserve's rate cut is actually a "defensive measure." Recent US economic data shows:

  • The real estate and manufacturing sectors experienced negative growth for two consecutive quarters.
  • The job market slowed, and the unemployment rate rose again to 4.6%.
  • Corporate profit growth has almost stagnated.

This means that the Federal Reserve has opted for a slight easing of monetary policy to buffer downside risks, choosing between "maintaining growth" and "controlling inflation."

But this operation also sends a signal:

The US economy may have entered a period of "slow decline".

In this situation, the market prefers to lock in profits rather than easily increase its holdings in risky assets.

05. Summary: Interest rate cuts ≠ bull market; liquidity is the core variable.

The market's reaction to this interest rate cut actually reveals the clearest logic:

Short-term policy easing ≠ ample liquidity ≠ asset price increases.

What could truly drive a full-blown reversal in the stock and crypto markets is the central bank restarting asset expansion (QE), or fiscal stimulus coupled with large-scale capital inflows.

Before that, interest rate cuts were only "neutral to slightly positive"—enough to stabilize confidence, but not enough to trigger a new bull market.

What the market wants is not a 25-point interest rate cut, but a real injection of liquidity.

Until then, 'risky assets' will have to wait.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

I really like what Pavel mentioned about not using a mobile phone. Essentially, this is an "information fasting" approach to the challenges of information overload, contrasting with the "food fasting" that everyone loves using apps. One is metaphysical, the other is physical, but ultimately, both affect the mind and body, influencing hormones like cortisol. Now and in the future, attention is the scarcest resource. Being able to freely disconnect from electronic devices is a luxury, a freedom with its own barriers. Pavel is also an extreme craftsman. The advantage of being a craftsman is that you can lead a small team to create a killer app. However, the limitation is that Telegram, as the largest instant messaging software outside of China and the US, cannot become another Tencent platform. This same culture has also influenced its Web3 project, TON. By the way, let me talk about my close observation of TON over the past four years as the first Chinese institutional investor in the world. 1. The wrong technological path was taken. TON's stubborn insistence on using C++ seems like a kind of technological purist obsession. Historically, Russians have repeatedly taken the wrong turn on the "data technology tree": the Soviet Union failed to adapt to the transistor revolution, became obsessed with vacuum tube performance optimization, and missed the entire chip wave. They often overemphasize performance and control, but neglect the ecosystem and development experience. TON's SDK, toolchain, and documentation ecosystem lack standardization, making the development threshold too high; this is not a syntax problem, but a problem of lacking platform thinking. 2. Uneven ecological composition. Currently, it's basically only Russians and Chinese who are active, but resource allocation is clearly biased towards the Russian-speaking region. This is something everyone is already familiar with. 3. Oligopoly. Funding, traffic, and narrative resources within the ecosystem are concentrated on a few "top" companies/projects. Everyone knows they must curry favor with the "top" teams, but mid-tier projects are severely squeezed out. There is also a long-term power struggle between foundations and the oligopolistic "top" companies, resulting in constant internal friction. 4. Failure to accept oneself. Accepting and reconciling with oneself is crucial for any individual or organization. Only on this basis can you face yourself honestly and leverage your strengths while mitigating your weaknesses. However, TON seems obsessed with pitching to Musk, persuading American investors, and getting to the White House. The truth is, no matter how hard it tries, in the eyes of others, TON remains a public chain with a Russian background. In contrast, BNB didn't try to play the "American" role. Instead, it first became the most popular chain in the Eastern Time Zone, simultaneously creating a sense of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among Westerners, before smoothly expanding internationally—a much more effective approach. 5. The story of "adoption for 1 billion users" has been told for four years, and it's still just a story. Pavel keeps telling a grand story of "connecting Telegram's 1 billion users with the blockchain world," but this story has yet to truly materialize. The reason isn't that the vision is false, but rather structural constraints: In order to survive and ensure Pavel's personal safety (in recent years, Pavel has become increasingly obsessed with his physical safety, given several incidents, including the recent events in France), Telegram must maintain a "superficial" separation from TON to avoid crossing regulatory red lines; this separation prevents TON from ever truly integrating with Telegram's ecosystem. Even stablecoins like USDE have maintained a supply of only a few hundred million—indicating that the story is grand, but the reality is small. TON possesses the perfectionism of engineering geeks, yet lacks the warmth of ecological collaboration; it has a massive entry point, but is hampered by regulatory realities; it has its own advantages, but has not yet reconciled with itself. It has a narrative and ideals, but these need to be transformed into a sustainable balance of systems and incentives. I wish the TON ecosystem will continue to improve.
Share
PANews2025/10/30 14:00
MoonBull, Brett, and Dogwifhat Compared

MoonBull, Brett, and Dogwifhat Compared

The post MoonBull, Brett, and Dogwifhat Compared appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 18 September 2025 | 05:15 Explore MoonBull Whitelist, Brett token, and Dogwifhat price action. Learn why MoonBull’s best crypto whitelist is live now with big FOMO potential. Ever wondered why meme coins stir so much hype in the crypto jungle? Traders, students, and even seasoned blockchain builders keep chasing the next peanut pile of gains, hoping their bags turn into bull-sized fortunes overnight. In today’s scene, names like Brett and Dogwifhat grab the spotlight, while MoonBull lights up conversations with its whitelist buzz. Each of these projects carries its own flavor, yet the energy they generate reveals how meme culture keeps shaking financial markets. Brett became a crowd darling by spinning internet humor into tokenomics. Dogwifhat turned playful memes into market waves, pulling traders in with viral appeal. Both show how lighthearted memes can fuel serious capital flow. Yet the chatter doesn’t stop with them. MoonBull now appears, sparking urgency with its whitelist, creating noise louder than a hippo splash in shallow waters. MoonBull’s whitelist offering exclusive early perks, the crypto crowd feels the tug of FOMO stronger than ever. This first-come, first-served invite could be a rare second shot at a moonshot. MoonBull Whitelist is Live: Your Chance to Join the Best Crypto Whitelist MoonBull ($MOBU) has entered the arena not as just another meme coin but as a project built with the precision of Ethereum’s secure backbone. Designed for those chasing explosive upside, MoonBull stacks its chips on elite staking rewards and secret token drops. Its whitelist isn’t simply a sign-up form; it’s a ticket into Stage One of the presale, where entry comes at the lowest price possible and doors swing open to bonus allocations. Being whitelisted is like being a penguin in the front row of a bull stampede. Whitelist members aren’t just joining…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 10:17